CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
+4140%
0.848 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1280MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.25 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
106.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GF110
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
GF110-040-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7730
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI FirePro 2270
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy