Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +51500%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
56
8
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA100
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy