Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.68GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2 +4900%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
R700
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy