Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition +13500%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jan 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cypress
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT (215-0735033)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy