Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +24145%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Hawaii
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy