CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
+9370%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
Radeon R7 265
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7730
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy