Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1050

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 25W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV410
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
24W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy