Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8400 SE and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 SE
0.029 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +1417%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy