Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8400 SE and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 SE
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +41279%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy