NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
8416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+47319%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
66
32
Shading Units
8448
16
TMUs
264
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
AD102
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
