Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +4304%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Tahiti
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy