Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +9149%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 8
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Fiji
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy