NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+1680%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
64
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
