NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
+211%
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
