Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +1083%
1.894 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net