Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +1990%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy