NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+936%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
