NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+747%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
112
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU106
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
