NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
+77%
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
112
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
289W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GT200B
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
