Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +2197%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
20
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Hawaii
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy