Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +236%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy