Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +944%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
20
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
DG1
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy