Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM +938%
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Curacao
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy