Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +8522%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
20
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
DG2-512
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy