NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
A2
+1584%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
10
112
Shading Units
1280
28
TMUs
40
20
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA107
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
