NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+7208%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
4096
28
TMUs
256
20
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
DG2-512
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
