NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
+371%
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
28
TMUs
48
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
