Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce 8800 Ultra and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 103.7GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 Ultra
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +779%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1080 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
103.7GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
39.17 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Tahiti
G80-450-A3
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy