Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +12190%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
16
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
TU117
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy