NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960A
+6213%
1.389 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GM107
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
N16P-GX-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
