NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1006MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
+2240%
0.515 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2017
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
978 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
256
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GM108S
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
