CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1035MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
5880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
+55309%
12.19 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
5888
4
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.36 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.19 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
190.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA104
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
13W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
3
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs AMD Radeon RX 6800S
4
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 805A
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120M Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs Intel Arc A570M
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy