Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 900M
Generation
M6x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.840 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.840 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

33W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK208B
GPU Name
M66
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy