Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
Lower TDP (16W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +632%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

965 MHz
Base Clock
-
993 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
256
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Amethyst
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

16W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy