NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 930M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 930M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1177MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 930M
0.723 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+733%
6.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 900M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
928 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
22.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
22.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GA107
N16S-GM
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
