Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG +27211%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy