Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +44966%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy