NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
RTX A400
+5913%
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
