Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +960%
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GT200B
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy