CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
+15737%
7.127 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI
2
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
3
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD FireStream 9350
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1550
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs MTT S70
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy