CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+14953%
6.774 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
18
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA107
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon X1550 PCI
2
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
3
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD FireStream 9350
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy