Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +18104%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 9
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Fiji
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy