Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +26566%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy