Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +3348%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 9
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy