NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+41279%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1 GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86S
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
