CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
0.09 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
+957%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
VS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 9
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
32
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
89.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G96-300-C1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
2
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
5
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 6530
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy