Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9500 GT
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +458%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy