CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT and 16GB VRAM Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9500 GT
0.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
+13556%
13.11 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT
VS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1382 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
409.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.21 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.11 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
819.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX LCS
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
6
ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
7
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy