Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +416%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 9
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Oland
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy