NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 17.02GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+4059%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
266 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
17.02GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
